Participant context
Frames follow-up, cohort support, and workshop interpretation without turning identity into public analysis input.

The engine is the interpretation layer behind the workshop audit. It connects participant context, tool behavior, data concerns, cost pressure, and support needs into visible tags, routing choices, evidence needs, and next actions. Nothing here saves participant data.
The point is not to flatten different truths into one answer. The engine preserves context first, then shows how the platform reached a recommendation.
Frames follow-up, cohort support, and workshop interpretation without turning identity into public analysis input.
Shows what people actually rely on, which privacy controls are known, and where enterprise or local alternatives matter.
Connects lived concern to routing rules, including what stays in the shared workspace or local knowledge layer.
Turns the audit into a participant action list, organization guidance, and six-month go/no-go/adjust evidence.
Nothing is selected until you choose the example evidence to compare.
No sources selected. Choose one or more inputs to see the interpretation and action trail.
Names lived experience, context, risk, and judgment.
Help summarize, compare, draft, and research when content is safe to route out.
Work against local knowledge, sensitive materials, and coalition memory.
Tools used, account type, settings checked, costs, and data categories.
Real use cases, privacy assumptions, support needs, and workshop notes.
Race bias, surveillance, privacy, ownership, misinformation, lock-in, and trust.
Participant guidance, organization next steps, evidence needs, and launch guardrails.
Use the Sweetgrass Workspace or shared Drive for the controlled pilot.
Define folders, access, retention, consent language, and what cannot leave that space.
Move approved patterns into a local knowledge layer and route AI use by sensitivity.
At six months, use evidence to go, stop, or adjust the Sweetgrass platform path.