Participant intake
Registration and audit responses begin in the Google ecosystem so client care can stay with the team’s familiar tools.
Sweetgrass data visualization
Google can hold the work. The site can hold the meaning.
This section frames the Future Bound data layer as a reviewed presentation surface: Google Forms, Sheets, and Looker-style summaries can remain the operational workspace, while the review site shows only approved aggregate evidence and decision signals.
Working review table
Jess, Keesha, and Brian can review, tag, suppress, and approve aggregate fields before anything becomes visible here.
Aggregate JSON
The site consumes reviewed counts, categories, and recommendations. No raw names, notes, or sensitive free text are needed.
Client-facing visualization
Future Bound shows the evidence path, charts, heat map, and decision signals without sending reviewers into the source sheet.
Example reviewed output
What the client should see first
The first read should answer: what concerns are rising, what tools are showing up, who needs support, and what cannot be launched without review.
Privacy and ownership lead the pattern.
AI use is already distributed across daily tools.
Different audiences need different next steps.
Movement leaders
privacy settings walkthrough · plain-language data rules · trusted workspace routing
Funders
aggregate pilot evidence · risk categories · six-month go / no-go / adjust readout
Technology support
tool inventory · sensitivity routing · blocked-data confirmation list
Publishing rule
Every chart needs a data route before it needs polish.
Google can produce charts quickly, but the review site should only display reviewed signals with a clear sensitivity level and a named destination.
SensitivityExample dataDestination
LowPublic information, agenda notesShared site or Drive folder
MediumOrganization operations or internal planningGoogle Workspace with named access
HighPeople stories, sensitive demographics, or third-party dataDo not publish; route to approved reviewer only